On 5 July 2017 at 20:35, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote:
> Yes, that might not be a terrible idea. I'd also be open to replacing
> the hashes of 0 with an n-byte length 0 string. It's a tiny paper
> cut (and a wire format change), but would make things slightly simpler .

I think that would be best.  With the change to the transcript hash,
the context would then be:
1. a transcript hash (size = hash function output)
2. 0 (size = 0)
3. ticket nonce (size = 1..255)

Out of interest, why not permit 0 length ticket nonces for those of us
that don't issue multiple tickets?

I think that we should take the hit and make the change.

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to