On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusva...@welho.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 01:18:05PM -0400, Shumon Huque wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Ilari Liusvaara < > ilariliusva...@welho.com> > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 11:33:45AM -0400, Shumon Huque wrote: > > > > > > > > > An RRset is defined as the set of records that share the same name, type, > > and class. So an RRsig RRset should cover signatures produced by > different > > keys for the same RRset. But if this sounds confusing, I'm okay with > "RRsig > > records". > > RRsig is special in that it is subtyped in RRdata. I don't know if > concept of "RRset" is redefined for RRsig to take that into account. > > I.e., does RRsig RRset include RRsig's for any possible A records (which > are very much not interesting here)? > I think we need to say the set of RRsig records that "cover" the type in question." Shumon.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
