Hi Yin,

The usual solution to this is to add a connection id. Please see:
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec/issues/6

-Ekr




On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 2:33 AM, yinxinxing <yinxinx...@huawei.com> wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
>
>
> I am Yin Xinxing from Huawei company. I am glad to join the TLS WG.
>
>
>
> For the DLTS 1.3 draft, I am interested and have some ideas to talk with
> you.
>
>
>
> DTLS has a lot of application scenarios in IOT fields, but currently,
> there is some difficulty when DTLS 1.2 is applied to IOT devices,
> especially the battery-constrained IOT devices.
>
>
>
> For example, when the IOT device wakes up from sleep mode, the NAT table
> may have expired.
>
> Then the IOT device has to establish a new DTLS session or at least
> launches a resume process with the server, the corresponding power
> consumption is too high for some power-constrained devices.
>
> How can DTLS renegotiation be avoided in order to save battery?
>
>
>
> I hope the contributors of DTLS 1.3 (or DTLS 1.2) can consider this
> problem and give a proper solution.
>
>
>
> Any comment or idea about this problem is welcome.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Yin Xinxing
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
>
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to