On 05/23/2017 01:07 PM, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote: > > I've seen a number of arguments here that essentially boil down to > "We'd like to keep it anyway, because it is so operationally > convenient". Is that really how this process works? Don't demonstrable > real-world attacks deserve deference?
The process is more like "once the participants have gotten used to an idea, it takes some time to digest countervailing reasoning when potentially subtle issues are involved". Without yet taking a position myself, it seems like at least some folks are coming around to see your position, and the dialogue should continue. -Ben
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
