On Monday, May 22, 2017 08:29:13 pm Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > Setting a collision-resistance floor rather than naming some list > of algorithms makes more sense to me, but if the WG really feels > that naming some "verbotten" algorithms is better, so be it.
My preference would be to do both. Call out the ones we have codepoints for by name (MD5/SHA1/SHA224), then have a general collision-resistance floor value for everything else. Dave _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
