On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Nico Williams <n...@cryptonector.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 01:43:32PM -0400, Richard Barnes wrote: > > As has been pointed out elsewhere, other key changes are signaled with a > > handshake message (KeyUpdate), so using a handshake message seems more > > natural from a protocol point of view. > > And as long as the record type goes in the clear, sending these sorts of > messages all with the same record type (handshake) seems best from a > traffic analysis p.o.v. > Actually at this point in the handshake the record type is encrypted. -Ekr > Nico > -- > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
