I would definitively re-categorize this “editorial”; there’s no 2119-changes proposed and there’s no bits on the wire changes. And, I’d either reject this one because technically the existing text is correct (i.e., they are two extensions) and this really ought not of caused an interoperability problem or mark it HFDU (hold for document update). The new text does include the code points, but those can be obtained from the registry and don’t absolutely have to be included.
spt > On May 10, 2017, at 02:45, RFC Errata System <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> > wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7250, > "Using Raw Public Keys in Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram > Transport Layer Security (DTLS)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5013 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: i <x...@example.net> > > Section: 7 > > Original Text > ------------- > IANA has allocated two new TLS extensions, client_certificate_type > and server_certificate_type, from the "TLS ExtensionType Values" > subregistry defined in [RFC5246]. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > IANA has allocated two new code points, 19 (0x13) and 20 (0x14), for > client_certificate_type and server_certificate_type, respectively, > in the "TLS ExtensionType Values" subregistry defined in [RFC5246]. > > Notes > ----- > > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC7250 (draft-ietf-tls-oob-pubkey-11) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Using Raw Public Keys in Transport Layer Security (TLS) > and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) > Publication Date : June 2014 > Author(s) : P. Wouters, Ed., H. Tschofenig, Ed., J. Gilmore, S. > Weiler, T. Kivinen > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Transport Layer Security > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
