On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Watson Ladd <watsonbl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Historically TLS protected against replay attacks. Now it doesn't. An > application that relies on this property which TLS used to guarantee > is now broken. Clearly we could have provided it, we just chose not > to. >
And that choice is insecure. If it's to be kept, I'd suggest renaming the protocol. -- Colm
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
