I have reviewed the draft and I support adoption of this draft. Agree that both the short-lived certificate and subcerts are addressing a similar issue and perhaps tradeoffs can be considered.
Thanks Sanjay -----Original Message----- From: Lurk [mailto:lurk-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sean Turner Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 3:31 PM To: <tls@ietf.org> Cc: l...@ietf.org Subject: [E] [Lurk] WG Call for adoption of draft-rescorla-tls-subcerts All, At our IETF 98 session, there was support in the room to adopt draft-rescorla-tls-subcerts [0]. We need to confirm this support on the list so please let the list know whether you support adoption of the draft and are willing to review/comment on the draft before 20170429. If you object to its adoption, please let us know why. Clearly, the WG is going to need to work through the trade-offs between short-lived certificates and sub-certs because both seem, to some, to be addressing the same problem. Cheers, J&S [0] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_html_draft-2Drescorla-2Dtls-2Dsubcerts&d=DwICAg&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=9a_L6t5TdnDThojv7KBKmqsZzTGM6YylS2wfbAO9KK0&m=jR4l13smzl6mjhJNFZzBEcBkfCAl-bHE1ztPqmR8cSU&s=1-VoLJ98RM8Ke0Zyp2Qad4rw9aXhVeIkqqMVEhfGtuw&e= _______________________________________________ Lurk mailing list l...@ietf.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_lurk&d=DwICAg&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=9a_L6t5TdnDThojv7KBKmqsZzTGM6YylS2wfbAO9KK0&m=jR4l13smzl6mjhJNFZzBEcBkfCAl-bHE1ztPqmR8cSU&s=pquB3m1OmFta3X4qksEg1egdeKwrUVL4c5W4YFgkSu0&e= _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
