On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusva...@welho.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 05:56:58AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/964 > > > > Here is a proposed set of new labels, which, while slightly less clear, > all > > fit > > into the 18 byte limit which Ilari (and I agree) says is what we have. > > Doing a santiy check... > > > external binder # was external psk binder key > > resumption binder # was resumption psk binder key > > client e. traffic # was client early traffic > > Isn't the previous label "client early traffic secret"? > Oops. Yeah, search and replace fail. > e. exporter master # was early exporter master secret > > client hs traffic # was client handshake traffic secret > > server hs traffic # was server handshake traffic secret > > client app traffic # was client application traffic secret > > server app traffic # was server application traffic secret > > exporter master # was exporter master secret > > resumption # was resumption master secret > > key # was key > > iv # was iv > > finished # was finished > > traffic key update # was application traffic secret > > exporter # was exporter > > Seems to be missing: > > derived secret # was derived secret > Yep. This one we can keep. Thans, -Ekr > > All look to fit into 18 bytes and none seem to be duplicated. > > > -Ilari >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
