On 3/23/17 8:14 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > I don't know how many other folks on the TLS WG list are prepared > to do a thorough review the DNSSEC aspects of this draft... > Perhaps the TLS and DNS communities overlap sufficiently that my > concern is not warranted?
I think it's quite warranted, and we're sending requests for review to both the dane mailing list (still open even though the wg shut down) and to dnsop. The DNS parts are more complicated than the actual extension mechanism and need expert review. We'll be requesting review once the new version is posted. Melinda
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls