On 15 March 2017 at 08:26, Yoav Nir <ynir.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > That is the document that was referenced by RFC 4492 and it’s from 1998. It > doesn’t mention any hash function other than SHA-1. > > RFC 4492 said that other hash functions may be used. We’ve upgraded it to a > SHOULD.
In light of recent developments, is there any reason we couldn't further upgrade this advice? _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls