On 15 March 2017 at 08:26, Yoav Nir <ynir.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That is the document that was referenced by RFC 4492 and it’s from 1998. It
> doesn’t mention any hash function other than SHA-1.
>
> RFC 4492 said that other hash functions may be used. We’ve upgraded it to a
> SHOULD.

In light of recent developments, is there any reason we couldn't
further upgrade this advice?

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to