It will be inelegant to have two code points for what is conceptually the same thing, but I think this is the best option, under the circumstances.
Cheers, Andrei From: Eric Rescorla [mailto:e...@rtfm.com] Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 10:53 AM To: Andrei Popov <andrei.po...@microsoft.com> Cc: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusva...@welho.com>; tls@ietf.org Subject: Re: [TLS] Updating for non-X.509 certificate types On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Andrei Popov <andrei.po...@microsoft.com<mailto:andrei.po...@microsoft.com>> wrote: > Does anyone use this? > I don't think anyone uses it. Au contraire: Windows TLS stack supports user_mapping and this mechanism appears to be somewhat in use. However, I agree that this falls into the category of extensions that need to be either deprecated or redefined for TLS 1.3. Are you OK with deprecated followed by redefined with a new code point? -Ekr Cheers, Andrei
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
