FWIW, I think DTLS 1.3 should just do this (and other header shortening stuff). I don't know of any evidence that there are policy enforcement boxes for DTLS
-Ekr On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Benjamin Kaduk <bka...@akamai.com> wrote: > On 03/08/2017 04:25 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > > Hi Ilari, > > yes, I am exactly talking about these bytes that are useless to send > around in some deployment environments. > > I would expect to at least provide the option of not sending the data in > some cases would be useful. > > > > I would not expect us to provide that option. The cost of introducing a > negotiation mechanism and interop headaches does not seem worth the gain of > three octets per encrypted record. > > -Ben > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
