Andreas, DTLS 1.3 will behave this way by default, so it would be better to just move to 1.3 rather than patching 1.2.
-Ekr On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 5:32 AM, Andreas Walz <andreas.w...@hs-offenburg.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > I stumbled upon an expired draft introducing a new (D)TLS extension to > omit explicit nonces in (D)TLS AEAD cipher modes > (draft-jay-tls-omit-aead-explicit-nonce-extension). > For a number of cipher suites, this would allow to reduce the per-record > overhead in (D)TLS by 8 bytes. > > Is there any interest in breathing new life into that draft? In our > scenario (DTLS for a legacy industrial wireless communication system) every > single byte counts. That is why we would strongly support reviving this > draft... > > Thanks and Cheers, > Andi Walz > > > ___________________________________ > > Andreas Walz > Research Engineer > Institute of reliable Embedded Systems and Communication Electronics > (ivESK) > Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, 77652 Offenburg, Germany > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
