On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 11:42:20PM -0500, Victor Vasiliev wrote:
> I am currently trying to figure out how much of QUIC certificate
> compression can be adapted to work with TLS.  I will submit a draft as soon
> as I have a working prototype.

FWIW I too have started working on a prototype for gzip compressing certificates
based on BoringSSL:
https://github.com/ghedo/boringssl/tree/cert_compress

It's not complete yet and I only implemented compression so far based on what
Chromium does with QUIC. I also haven't really tested it yet (but at least it
builds AFAICT :) ).

I'd like to do some tests as well to measure the benefits of this (e.g.
download certificates from CT logs and see how effective the compression is).

I also started working on a draft for gzip compression of certificates at:
https://github.com/ghedo/tls-certificate-compression

Or that's the current scope anyway. Maybe it would also make sense to include
the full QUIC certificate caching part, but I didn't want to duplicate RFC7924.

My intention would be to use gzip-compressed certs on first connect, and then
use RFC7924 for consecutive handshakes.

The text is not complete and I haven't submitted it yet, though it would be
nice if we could work on the same draft together, in order to avoid duplicating
work (I can give you or anyone interested commit access to the repo).

Cheers

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to