I worry about the buffer sizes required on embedded devices. Hopefully the other endpoint would be programmed to limit record sizes, but is that something we want to rely on? This could be a parameter agreed upon during the handshake, but that seems bad.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <n...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 00:39 -0800, Judson Wilson wrote: > > Can you send multiple records in one data transfer to achieve > > whatever gains are desired? > > The packetization cost still remains even if you do that. However, the > question is how does the 2^14 limit comes from, and why TLS 1.3 should > keep it? > > regards, > Nikos > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
