+1 to TLS 1.3. My strong preference is TLS 1.3.
Reasons have been advanced ad-nauseam.
Just a couple of additional thoughts:
1.3 is in the protocol. So there.
"Perl 6". Just because you advance a version number to a big one,
doesn't mean that businesses will see the justification to upgrade.
Sean
On 11/17/2016 6:12 PM, Sean Turner wrote:
At IETF 97, the chairs lead a discussion to resolve whether the WG should
rebrand TLS1.3 to something else. Slides can be found @
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides-97-tls-rebranding-aka-pr612-01.pdf.
The consensus in the room was to leave it as is, i.e., TLS1.3, and to not
rebrand it to TLS 2.0, TLS 2, or TLS 4. We need to confirm this decision on
the list so please let the list know your top choice between:
- Leave it TLS 1.3
- Rebrand TLS 2.0
- Rebrand TLS 2
- Rebrand TLS 4
by 2 December 2016.
Thanks,
J&S
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
