On 15 November 2016 at 16:12, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <n...@redhat.com> wrote: > TLDR; the privacy offered by this extension is the same as the privacy > of DTLS over UDP.
I disagree. All the privacy considerations of the QUIC connection ID apply here. It would probably pay to follow that discussion. If the intent of this is simply to deal with the NAT rebinding issue, then I think that this is worth doing, but to say that this does not have privacy issues would be overstating the case. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
