+1 Xiaoyin
From: Eric Rescorla<mailto:e...@rtfm.com> Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 11:26 AM To: Stephen Farrell<mailto:stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> Cc: tls@ietf.org<mailto:tls@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01 +1 This draft just codifies stuff that we had already agreed on but had been awkwardly stuffed in TLS 1.3. Having it separate is an improvement. -Ekr On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie<mailto:stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie>> wrote: Hi all, Sean and Joe wrote up this IANA registry draft as per discussions at WG meetings and on the list. As they've done the initial work, but are WG chairs, they wanted me (as responsible AD) to call consensus for it. (They wrote this up as finding authors for such fairly boring stuff was hard - thank them for taking one for us all when you see 'em:-) Based on the earlier discussions and limited mails on this draft, I do think there's consensus to adopt this approach and that the text in the I-D [1] is a good enough starting point for the WG. If you think otherwise, please comment to the list in the next week. If you've questions about all this from a process-crap POV, feel free to ask those on or off the list as you think appropriate;-) Note that if this is adopted as a WG item, the chairs might decide to continue as editors or recruit someone else. In the former case, I'm fine with doing the WGLC stuff when this is ready (which it nearly is IMO, so there may or may not be a need for new authors, depends on what the WG think of the text I'd guess). Cheers, S. [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01 _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org<mailto:TLS@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
