This seems like a good change. I'll merge this on Monday (pre draft-17)
unless I hear objections

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thom...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'm sympathetic to this, but just to be clear...
>
> You are suggesting that end_of_early_data and close_notify will be
> marked "fatal".
>
> WFM.
>
> On 15 October 2016 at 08:07, Kyle Nekritz <knekr...@fb.com> wrote:
> > After PR #625 all alerts are required to be sent with fatal AlertLevel
> > except for close_notify, end_of_early_data, and user_canceled. Since
> those
> > three alerts all have separate specified behavior, the AlertLevel field
> is
> > not serving much purpose, other than providing potential for misuse. We
> > (Facebook) currently receive a number of alerts at incorrect levels from
> > clients (internal_error warning alerts, etc.). I propose deprecating this
> > field to simplify implementations and require that any misuse be ignored.
> >
> >
> >
> > PR: https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/693
> >
> >
> >
> > Kyle
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TLS mailing list
> > TLS@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to