This seems like a good change. I'll merge this on Monday (pre draft-17) unless I hear objections
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thom...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm sympathetic to this, but just to be clear... > > You are suggesting that end_of_early_data and close_notify will be > marked "fatal". > > WFM. > > On 15 October 2016 at 08:07, Kyle Nekritz <knekr...@fb.com> wrote: > > After PR #625 all alerts are required to be sent with fatal AlertLevel > > except for close_notify, end_of_early_data, and user_canceled. Since > those > > three alerts all have separate specified behavior, the AlertLevel field > is > > not serving much purpose, other than providing potential for misuse. We > > (Facebook) currently receive a number of alerts at incorrect levels from > > clients (internal_error warning alerts, etc.). I propose deprecating this > > field to simplify implementations and require that any misuse be ignored. > > > > > > > > PR: https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/693 > > > > > > > > Kyle > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > TLS mailing list > > TLS@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > > > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls