On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:13:57AM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On 10/12/2016 09:27 AM, Ilari Liusvaara wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 09:43:05PM +1100, Martin Thomson wrote: > > > That would waste a bit of space with extensions signaling support > > for some rewrites if the server doesn't use those but retries the > > handshake. > > > > I'm having trouble parsing this. The idea is that the client would > waste some space in the new CH because the server doesn't have a way to > indicate that the client only needs to send a subset of what it sent the > first time around?
Well, depends on the extension... Actually, not a major issue, given that there is usually a great amount of bloat in the second CH (just to make it look like CH, instead of just transporting what is needed). -Ilari _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
