Xiaoyin Liu <xiaoyi...@outlook.com> writes: >Not directly related to Rich's question, but will we settle the "TLS 1.3 -> >TLS 2.0" >discussion (PR #612) before WGLC? Or has this already been closed as "keeping >the current name"?
The impression I got from the discussion was that most people, or at least those who contributed, wanted 2.0, or at least something other than 1.3. I was kinda surprised to see it still being referred to as 1.3. Peter. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
