All,

It’s time to put this one to bed.  ekr’s going to put back user_mapping for 
Andrei/MS, but we’re going to ban/orphan the client_authz and server_authz 
extensions.  If it turns out that there’s some need to later unban/unorphan 
them, then somebody can write a draft that specifies how they’re used with 
TLS1.3.

spt

> On Sep 06, 2016, at 23:58, Russ Housley <hous...@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> I agree that client_authz and server_authz have not enjoyed much 
> implementation.
> 
> Russ
> 
> 
> On Sep 3, 2016, at 3:54 PM, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote:
> 
>> https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/624
>> 
>> We currently have code points assigned for
>> 
>>  user_mapping [RFC4681]     
>>  client_authz [RFC5878]      
>>  server_authz [RFC5878] 
>> 
>> These aren't well-specified for use in TLS 1.3 and my sense is that they
>> are barely used. Any objections to just banning them? If not, I'll merge this
>> PR end of next week.
>> 
>> -Ekr
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to