All, It’s time to put this one to bed. ekr’s going to put back user_mapping for Andrei/MS, but we’re going to ban/orphan the client_authz and server_authz extensions. If it turns out that there’s some need to later unban/unorphan them, then somebody can write a draft that specifies how they’re used with TLS1.3.
spt > On Sep 06, 2016, at 23:58, Russ Housley <hous...@vigilsec.com> wrote: > > I agree that client_authz and server_authz have not enjoyed much > implementation. > > Russ > > > On Sep 3, 2016, at 3:54 PM, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: > >> https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/624 >> >> We currently have code points assigned for >> >> user_mapping [RFC4681] >> client_authz [RFC5878] >> server_authz [RFC5878] >> >> These aren't well-specified for use in TLS 1.3 and my sense is that they >> are barely used. Any objections to just banning them? If not, I'll merge this >> PR end of next week. >> >> -Ekr > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls