The following errata report has been verified for RFC6066, "Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions".
-------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6066&eid=4817 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: ResponderIDs type is not defined anywhere. <vincentle...@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2016-10-03 Verified by: Stephen Farrell (IESG) Section: 8 Original Text ------------- In the OCSPStatusRequest, the "ResponderIDs" provides a list of OCSP responders that the client trusts. Corrected Text -------------- In the OCSPStatusRequest, the "ResponderID" provides a list of OCSP responders that the client trusts. or clearer In OCSPStatusRequest, the "responder_id_list" provides a list of "ResponderID", OCSP responders that the client trusts. Notes ----- ResponderIDs is not defined anywhere within the document. Quote of this section in RFC6961 section 2.2 (p.4) seem to have fixed this. -------------------------------------- RFC6066 (draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-12) -------------------------------------- Title : Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions Publication Date : January 2011 Author(s) : D. Eastlake 3rd Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Transport Layer Security Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
