On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 03:06:25PM -0400, Sean Turner wrote: > I’m not seeing objections to this PR so please let us know by Friday > (7 October) whether you see any issues with what’s been proposed. > > > On Sep 22, 2016, at 20:42, Nick Sullivan <nicholas.sulli...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > PR: https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/654
The only issue that comes to mind is where extensions that are specific to the certificate chain instead to the certificate go. E.g. if a new kind of certificate chain[1] is ever implemented using client_certificate_type/server_certificate_type (or anything similar for that matter). [1] E.g. for allowing multisigning EE certificates (currently one can multisign CA certificates, but not EE ones). -Ilari _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
