Hi Ekr,

I read through the text and I think it is an improvement.

I only had one question that is only slightly related to your edits because it came up in the interop testing with the Mint implementation.

"
Servers requiring this extension SHOULD respond to a ClientHello
lacking a "server_name" extension by terminating the connection
with a "missing_extension" alert.
"

I personally would find it more useful to have an alert saying "missing_server_name_extension" instead of just returning "missing_extension" for a number of different extensions since this gives the client no chance to fix the problem without human intervention.

Ciao
Hannes

On 09/05/2016 08:02 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
PR: https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/625

Currently the TLS spec requires implementations to send alerts under various
fatal conditions. However, many stacks actually don't send alerts but
instead
just terminate the connection. Several people have argued that we should
relax
the requirement.

At the September 2015 interim there was consensus to instead encourage
sending alerts and require that if you send an alert, you send a
specific one.
I've finally gotten around to producing a PR that does this (link
above). This
PR:

- Harmonizes all the language around alert sending (though perhaps I missed
  a couple of places)
- Tries to make which alerts to send clearer in the alert descriptions
to avoid
  having to specify individually how to handle every decision.
- Relaxes the requirement as listed above.

Note that these are to some extent orthogonal changes; even if we decide to
continue mandating sending alerts, that should be listed in one location not
scattered around the spec.

I know that there wasn't universal consensus on relaxing the requirement to
send, so I'll await WG discussion and the chairs decision on how to
handle this PR.

-Ekr



_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls


_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to