On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:32:41PM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusva...@welho.com> > wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:20:02PM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Ilari Liusvaara < > > ilariliusva...@welho.com> > > > wrote: > > > > I don't think this is just aesthetic issue: > > > > Perhaps I should have said "minor implementation inconvenience"
Yeah, turns out the easiest way is to save the hash (used a new field instead of just trashing client_random/server_random with this value, because that is less effort to do). -Ilari _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
