On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 11:20:46 +0200 Hubert Kario <hka...@redhat.com> wrote:
> so it looks to me like while we may gain a bit of compatibility by > using extension based mechanism to indicate TLSv1.3, Just quick: This was discussed yesterday, David Benjamin had an interesting proposal, but it was largely met with resistance. So from the WG discussion yesterday I had the impression that we will most likely stay with the existing clienthello version mechanism. While that will cause us more trouble, it's probably the cleaner option anyway. So we definitely should continue investigating version intolerance and tell people to fix their stuff. I'm now also collecting some data and have some preliminary suspicion on affected devices. My numbers roughly match yours that we are in the more or less 3% area of 1.3 intolerance. -- Hanno Böck https://hboeck.de/ mail/jabber: ha...@hboeck.de GPG: BBB51E42
pgp5ozrzxnTqc.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
