On 19/05/16 02:16, Alia Atlas wrote: > Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-tls-falsestart-02: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-falsestart/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For Stephen, yes, I noticed :-)
Great. Sean's is better though:-) > > In support of Kathleen's comment and based on the shepherd's write-up, > why is this experimental and what is > the experiment? There's no good answer, sorry. I knew folks would ask, so I asked the WG and it seems to me to be a case that nobody cares really so they just picked one and aren't much energised to talk more about it. That's not too unreasonable. See the thread at [1] for some more. Given that this is widely deployed and a similar feature is being included in TLS1.3, there is no real experiment here, what the WG care about is that this RFC be not-PS I reckon. S. [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/UDiFtVrQhjP9MXMW45tiYHrCDn8 > > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
