I share the more broadly-stated concern that this draft introduces terminology and architectural framings that don't match how things work either in practice or in existing documents. I understand that the authors are looking for a tool to get a better handle on the protocol, but if there's a need for a clearer terminology section in a core specification it might best be written by someone who does have "insider"-level knowledge of the protocol and how it's implemented, etc. (I don't think that need exists, for the little that's worth).
Melinda _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
