On Sun, April 3, 2016 7:24 pm, Salz, Rich wrote: > >> A stable, publicly available document is basically an RFC. > > Not always; ISO et al.
That's why I said "basically"; it's a qualifier. But keep in mind what kind of stable, publicly available document needs to be published: a description not of the algorithm but of how that algorithm get crammed into the TLS exchange. (For example, not RFC 7539 which describes chacha20+poly1305 as a glot but draft-ietf-tls-chacha20-poly1305 which says how to cram that glot into TLS). So even if some one/company was able to get a National Body to push in in ISO I doubt ISO would entertain documents whose content was "cram alg described elsewhere into TLS like this" with changes to ServerKeyExchange etc. Dan. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
