On 2016-03-30 17:33, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
I am not sure that we want to be in the business of explicitly marking things as insecure other than our own RFCs, though -- there could be an implication of more review than is actually the case, which is what this proposal is trying to get rid of.
So how about explicitly marking things as "obsolete" instead? _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
