On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote:

> This got a lot of discussion early in the design process and the consensus
> was that the risk of having the default mode (with existing certs) allow
> the
> creation of a long-term delegation was too high. See, for instance, the
> relative impact of the recent paper by Jager at al. [0] on TLS 1.3 and
> QUIC.
>
> With that said, I think this would be a good feature to look at in future
> and the right way to do it is to:
>
> 1. Add a "this is only usable for TLS 1.3 [or for subcerts]" extension to
> PKIX.
> 2. Add a subcert extension to TLS 1.3.
>

OK, awesome.  Is it too early to volunteer for this effort?  Do you know
who the right person is to contact?

Thanks again,
Bill
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to