On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Colm MacCárthaigh <c...@allcosts.net>
wrote:
>
> +1 but I think we can go further here and specify 0RTT in such a way that
> it only works when the server maintains state, and so that any given 0RTT
> ticket may only be used once (to preserve forward secrecy as much as
> possible within the constrains of 0RTT).
>

I'm not enthusiastic about this. This seems like it would rule out a bunch
of implementations
which don't need that guarantee.

-Ekr


>
>
> --
> Colm
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
>
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to