Piling on, I can't see why we would want to do this -Ekr
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thom...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 18 March 2016 at 12:37, Mike Hamburg <m...@shiftleft.org> wrote: > > No. The goal should be to remove ciphers, not add new ones, unless we > have > > a really compelling reason. > > A necessary, but sufficient set of reasons might include: > > 1. thorough cryptanalysis > 2. advantages over existing ciphers on important metrics like security > and speed, though this would likely need to be significant at this > point > 3. interest in implementation > > Speck is 0 from 3. > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
