> I hadn't seen that! I wonder is there an appetite here for including more > robust LH in TLS1.2 in some form? I mean a real one; as in - let's it get it > into servers and browsers sooner than TLS1.3.
H2 has padding; put it there. There is probably zero interest in adding padding to TLS 1.2, especially since the record type is plaintext and could easily be bypassed. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
