On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 8:10 PM David Benjamin <david...@chromium.org> wrote:
> If changing the existing meaning is a nuisance, another option is to > continue to allocate new values but only define ecdsa_p256_sha256, > ecdsa_p384_sha384, and ecdsa_p521_sha512 (or whatever your favorite subset > is) for TLS 1.3 and later. > (Hrm. Nevermind, actually. If we go with only those three, I don't think this option does anything useful. If we go with a superset, we might want it separate? Would have to think about that to convince myself. Anyway, whether/how to subset is the more important question. Overlap's mostly an optimization.) David
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
