On Thursday 24 December 2015 01:04:59 Christian Huitema wrote: > On Wednesday, December 23, 2015 3:05 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > >> Similarly, in the HKDF-Expand-Label, do we assume a final null byte > >> for the "label"?> > > No. I wonder if we should instead add the '\0' explicitly in the > > 4.8.1 for maximal clarity. > Either that, or just remove the trailing 00 from the binary > description.
the 0-byte is a C-ism that looks like a wart to me neither of the previous TLS versions used null-terminated C-style strings so why TLS1.3 should? Especially in just one place? -- Regards, Hubert Kario Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
