All, The CFRG is currently conducting a quaker poll about filling in two missing functions for the 448 so we’re going follow the suggestion from ekr/ilari to wait until they’re done. If you care to chime in on the poll it can be found here: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/XxJ9PwL6GjEq6necM83Hr8JoIw0
spt > On Nov 23, 2015, at 17:01, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: > > if it's only a few weeks, let's just do all the signature code points > then. > > -Ekr > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> > wrote: > > Hiya, > > On 23/11/15 14:21, Sean Turner wrote: > > All, > > > > We’ve received an early code point assignment for the following 4 > > Is the word "request" missing above? Either that or I'm forgetting > more than I suspected:-) > > > (four) elliptic curve points that will go in the "Supported Groups" > > Registry: > > > > // ECDH functions. ecdh_x25519 ecdh_x448 > > > > // Signature curves. eddsa_ed25519 eddsa_ed448 > > I think 3 of the above are clearly fine now. > > I'd suggest holding off on eddsa_ed448 for a while until CFRG > are done, but maybe establishing now that there is consensus in > the WG to allocate that as soon as CFRG are done (where "done" > means folks can implement and interop, not that the RFCs are > issued). > > AFAIK the state of play within CFRG on that is that the chairs > plan to do a few polls for the couple of remaining issues in > a few weeks, so we're not talking about a major delay and to > be fair, CFRG recently have delivered more or less when they > said they would. > > My reason to suggest this is just in case CFRG discover some > last minute stuff. While burning a code-point for that wouldn't > be a problem, we'd be better off without the confusion. > > But if (the chairs tell me) there's clear consensus for some > other action here, I'll consider myself in the rough and go with > that. > > Cheers, > S. > > > > > > These points will be included in the following 2 (two) drafts: > > draft-ietf-tls-tls13 draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis. > > > > Early code points are permitted in the “Supported Groups” registry > > and the chairs (that’s us) need to determine whether there is support > > for these assignments. Some input has already been received and > > those people do not need to respond again to this call, but we’d like > > to hear from others whether they support early code point assignment > > for these curves. If you do not please state why. We’re looking for > > input by November 30th. > > > > J&S _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list > > TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > > > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
