Dave Garrett <davemgarr...@gmail.com> writes:

>A TLS extension to negotiate max length might be viable.

I think a better starting point would be to look at the implementation that's
causing the problem.  There's nothing magical about a 16K max segment size
that causes poor performance, TCP typically has an MSS of 1400-1500 bytes, one
tenth of the TLS segment size, without there being a 187% loss in throughput
so it looks like the problem is in the implementation, not the protocol.  I
don't see any reason why you couldn't get close to wire speeds, or at least
min( crypto speed, wire speed ) for TLS for a properly-done implementation.

Peter.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to