On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Bill Cox <waywardg...@google.com> wrote:
> I am not sure why we have a 0-RTT connect, but only a 1-RTT resume. If > anything, it seems like it would be easier to have a secure 0-RTT resume > than a 0-RTT connect, though the 0-RTT connect does use some information > from prior connections. > > Is there a good reason for having only a 0-RTT connect, and not resume? > The intention *is* to have a 0-RTT resume, since PSK and 0-RTT should be compatible. The spec may not be entirely clear on this point, though. -Ekr Thanks, > Bill > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
