Hi Mike, On 12/2/15 4:14 PM, Mike Copley wrote: > [...] Not sure if this is the right place to consider, but would DTLS 1.3(?) > be able to encrypt headers and still handle packet loss and re-ordering? If > DTLS needs cleartext headers, would it be better to advise one approach for > both protocols?
Please see the other recent E-mails in this discussion thread specifically addressing how my first proposal extends to DTLS. My second proposed approach to header encryption is admittedly more TCP-specific, and that might be one legitimate reason to prefer the first one if we care about keeping TLS and DTLS as closely-aligned as possible. B > > Regards, > > Mike Copley > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
