On Nov 17, 2015, at 16:40, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote:
>
> > 1. The Cipher Suites "Recommended" column was populated based on
> > the Standards Track RFCs listed in the document (and I removed the
> > others).
>
> Isn’t it just the MTI suites listed in s8.1?
>
> Maybe I need to go check the minutes, but I thought it was the
> Standards Track ones, not the MTI ones that we agreed on.
> The difference here is largely the FFDHE cipher suites and CCM.
From Jim’s notes in the etherpad:
AOB
SPT: Requests for additional ciphers from others. Listing in A.4
Suggest thinning it down to the SHOULD/MUST list only.
EKR: Need to encourage support for PSK variants
EKR: Looking at the difference between the "good" list and the "safe" list and
the "no opinion" list
EKR: Sample case would be 448 - not a MUST/SHOULD but still think it is good.
spt
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
