On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 16 November 2015 at 19:52, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: > >> I have to ask why the continued insistence on calling the thing that > >> forms part of the nonce an "IV". I find it to be misleading. > > > > > > This is the historical terminology that TLS has used. > > It was actually accurate when we were using CBC modes, but now it's > just confusing. > It wasn't accurate in TLS 1.1 or later. -Ekr
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
