On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <n...@redhat.com>
wrote:
>
> I agree that protecting the length of the communicated data is
> important, but there is nothing specific to this cipher.


I wouldn't contest that; I just think the I-D is over-selling ChaCha20's
side-channel resistance. I would argue that in real practical terms it is
less side-channel resistant than AES-CBC; but I think a reader would be
left with the opposite impression.

Still huge +1 on adding it; it's exciting to get a fast modern
well-designed cipher into TLS.

-- 
Colm
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to