On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:17:10AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Short, Todd <tsh...@akamai.com> wrote: > > > I like the idea. If the functionality is to be merged, perhaps harmonizing > > the names and contents of the messages (if possible)? > > > > Yes. My plan is to name it HelloRetryRequest and get rid of > HelloVerifyRequest.
Bit crazy idea: Have vector of causes handshake went wrong (e.g. required share missing, cookie required). Then the client verifies that that: - There is at least one cause - All causes are known (can't retry with unknown error) - All causes are proper (e.g. actual missing share). -Ilari _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
