On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 02:01:59AM -0400, Dave Garrett wrote:
> On Sunday, October 11, 2015 01:53:34 am Dave Garrett wrote:
> > If the trust model doesn't need the problematic portion of the chain,
> > then the chain is not trustworthy and this does not apply.
>
> Sorry, follow-up to fix a rather critical typo from a double negative.
> The "is not trustworthy" was meant to be "is not untrustworthy". If the
> trust model doesn't need a part to trust the peer, then it's not untrusted;
> it's irrelevant. The overall chain can be trustworthy regardless of what's
> in parts it doesn't care about.
Yes, of course.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
