On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Dave Garrett <davemgarr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The client initially has no way of telling apart a conformant TLS 1.3 > server, a TLS 1.2 server, a TLS 1.0 server full of bugs, or a potato. > Right. I am not saying anything about how to *receive* alerts. That's a separate topic. What I'm saying is that a conformant TLS 1.3 implementation shouldn't be required to send fatal alerts in any circumstance; i.e. there should be no "MUST send" requirements for (fatal) alerts. Also, I agree with Martin Rex's recent reply to this thread. Cheers, Brian -- https://briansmith.org/
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
