Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> writes: >I'm not sure how to process that comment. You ask for X, I ask is Y==X and >your answer is that Y doesn't exist? Seems odd. ;-)
There's a difference between "X/Y exists" (but no-one knows about it) and "X/Y exists and is actively used". As I said, I've never seen the BCP quoted, cited, or referenced in any third-party standard that deals with TLS (and by third-party standard I don't mean other RFCs but industry standards like IEC 61850 or IEC 62351). >Feel free to collect a bunch of your own emails (hand-wringing or not:-) and >shoot those out as an I-D. That makes it worse, not better, because it's just creating one more I-D or RFC or BCP or whatever to languish in obscurity. The profiles need to be part of the TLS spec where they'll be noticed and used by other standards referencing it. Peter. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
